From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: gitweb wishlist Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <4292A08A.5050108@cobite.com> <20050524161745.GA9537@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050524184612.GA23637@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050524202846.GC25606@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Mansfield , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kay Sievers , Petr Baudis , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 24 22:45:55 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DagFw-0002rH-FB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:44:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262042AbVEXUph (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 16:45:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262033AbVEXUph (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 16:45:37 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:52441 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262042AbVEXUpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 16:45:30 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4OKjLjA021877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 May 2005 13:45:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4OKjK6w016162; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:45:21 -0700 To: Thomas Glanzmann In-Reply-To: <20050524202846.GC25606@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.40__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 May 2005, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > > Just call cvsps with -z "20" for the mutt repository also -z 1 should > work because the timestamps of one 'commit' are all set to the same > value. Ahh, the mutt people really use something else for development, and this is just an export into CVS (like the Linux bkcvs tree)? Or do they just have fast machines and no networking? Or are there good versions of CVS around that re-use the same time across one whole commit? Linus