From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Shameless troll ;o)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:06:33 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601031559400.3668@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601031546430.3668@g5.osdl.org>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> The fact is, they all have their biases. The fact that open source tends
> to strike a chord with them and they almost universally end up
> understanding about freedom of the GPL kind is usually a big help. The
> fact that some have other biases don't make them worse journalists. It
> just means that you see different kinds of stories from them.
Btw, I actually in many ways prefer the critical ones over the positive
ones, which may be one reason I actually appreciate Dan Lyons even though
obviously a lot of people don't. I find it interesting to see what the
other side thinks, even if it's often something you know is wrong.
The fact is, journalists seldom get any tech story really right. If they
did, they'd be technical people. You can react to it two ways: either
realize that some people see it that way (which can be illuminating - if
only because you might realize that stories you _believed_ in might not
be exactly true either) or just dismissing the story and the teller of the
story.
Yeah, I even watch Fox news occasionally.
I think the news stories that disagree with our own beliefs are often the
ones that tell us the most.
Admittedly, sometimes they just tell us that people are idiots ;)
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-03 1:22 [OT] Shameless troll ;o) walt
2006-01-03 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-03 4:31 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2006-01-03 14:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-03 15:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-01-03 19:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-01-03 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-03 22:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-03 22:47 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-01-03 23:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-01-03 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-04 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-01-04 1:10 ` Chuck Lever
2006-01-04 3:45 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-04 1:49 Brown, Len
2006-01-04 4:56 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0601031559400.3668@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wa1ter@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).