From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-mv.perl: use stderr for error output and cleanup Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:28:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <81b0412b0601050349s6bec1a36jc410fd315fbbc4c@mail.gmail.com> <7vek3lq8wu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <86wthd7ypx.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 07 00:29:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev11A-000050-TL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:29:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932285AbWAFX3G (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:29:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932652AbWAFX3F (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:29:05 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:45017 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932285AbWAFX3E (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:29:04 -0500 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k06NStDZ014262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:28:55 -0800 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k06NSrEC018608; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:28:54 -0800 To: "Randal L. Schwartz" In-Reply-To: <86wthd7ypx.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3 required=5 tests=PATCH_SUBJECT_OSDL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.64__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.129 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "Junio" == Junio C Hamano writes: > > Junio> So I'd prefer not touching for (@df) { print H "$_\n" } loops. > > Being as I'm a *bit* familiar with Perl, I'd write that as: > > print H "$_\0" for @deletedfiles; > > if you want to write "for" as "foreach", I wouldn't complain either. > After all, that's spelled "f o r", but pronounced "foreach". :) It is official: perl people are crazy. I'm sorry, Randal, but you're clearly a totally different species. I just hope you don't cross-breed. Shudder. Linus