From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] count-delta.c: Match the delta data semantics change in version 3. Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:54:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7v7j846qco.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vbqxg3tdd.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 10 02:54:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7NUZ-0002LW-8N for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:54:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750991AbWBJByd (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:54:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750992AbWBJByd (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:54:33 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:49638 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbWBJByc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:54:32 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([24.202.136.67]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUG00H367YVIJA0@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:54:32 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <7vbqxg3tdd.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@localhost.localdomain To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > I agree with the general direction and this futureproofing is a > > good thing to have before 1.2.0, I think. > > > > The bit is however _already_ looked at by the count_delta(), > > to assess the extent of damage, IIRC. Should we be > > futureproofing that bit as well? > > Something like this? Right. Nicolas