From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Handling large files with GIT
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:58:03 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602141953081.3691@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602141829080.3691@g5.osdl.org>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So in case people want to try, here's a third patch. Oh, and it's against
> my _original_ path, not incremental to the middle one (ie both patches two
> and three are against patch #1, it's not a nice series).
>
> Now I'm really done, and won't be sending out any more patches today.
Still true. I've just been thinking about the last state.
As far as I can tell, the output from git-merge-tree with that fix to only
simplify subdirectories that match exactly in all of base/branch1/branch2
is precisely the output that git-merge-recursive actually wants.
Rather than doing a three-way merge with "git-read-tree", and then doing
"git-ls-files --unmerged", I think this gives the same result much more
efficiently.
That said, I can't follow the python code, so maybe I'm missing something.
Fredrik cc'd, in case he can put me right.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-15 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-08 9:14 Handling large files with GIT Martin Langhoff
2006-02-08 11:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-02-08 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-08 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-08 20:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-08 21:20 ` Florian Weimer
2006-02-08 22:35 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-02-13 1:26 ` Ben Clifford
2006-02-13 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-13 4:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-13 5:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-13 23:17 ` Ian Molton
2006-02-13 23:19 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-02-14 18:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-02-14 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-14 21:21 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-14 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-14 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-15 0:40 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-15 1:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-15 4:03 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-15 2:07 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-02-15 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-15 2:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-15 2:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-15 3:58 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-02-15 9:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-15 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-15 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-16 3:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-16 3:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-16 20:32 ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2006-02-13 5:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-13 6:07 ` Keith Packard
2006-02-14 0:07 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-02-13 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-13 4:40 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-02-09 4:54 ` Greg KH
2006-02-09 5:38 ` Martin Langhoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0602141953081.3691@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=freku045@student.liu.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).