From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] relax delta selection filtering in pack-objects Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7vpslgrkr0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vhd6rsvqd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 22 17:05:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBwU0-00018E-SE for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:04:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932248AbWBVQEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932255AbWBVQEW (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:22 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:52939 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248AbWBVQEW (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:22 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([24.202.136.67]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IV3009TGJB9I420@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:21 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <7vhd6rsvqd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@localhost.localdomain To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > I haven't dug into the issue yet, but these four delta series > > seem to break the testsuite. > > I bisected. It is the adler32 one -- since it makes the > generated delta much smaller, it is understandable that it would > interact with the break/rename heuristics. It is not strictly > breakage in that sense -- we just need to readjust the > heuristics thresholds for those algorithms. I had a quick look and that code rather looks like black magic to me atm. I however found a memory leak in diffcore-rename.c:estimate_similarity(): delta = diff_delta(src->data, src->size, dst->data, dst->size, &delta_size, delta_limit); if (!delta) /* If delta_limit is exceeded, we have too much differences */ return 0; /* A delta that has a lot of literal additions would have * big delta_size no matter what else it does. */ if (base_size * (MAX_SCORE-minimum_score) < delta_size * MAX_SCORE) return 0; \________ delta memory is leaked. Nicolas