git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Jason Riedy <ejr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git 1.3.2 on Solaris
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:48:18 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605231144230.5623@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605231110230.5623@g5.osdl.org>



On Tue, 23 May 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> I absolutely agree. That is why the OS has a "access()" system call. It's 
> there to ask the OS whether the file is executable (or readable/writable).

Side note: I'm not claiming that "access()" is a wonderful thing. I do 
agree that we might want to replace it with something else inside of git, 
if only because of portability concerns.

So I'm really just ranting my normal "standards lawyerese doesn't mean 
much" rant..

(access() also has other isses: X_OK obviously means different things for 
directories and for regular files, so quite often you need to do a stat() 
on the thing _anyway_ just to determine whether it's "executable in the 
'execve()' sense" or "executable in the 'path lookup' sense").

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-23 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-16 23:52 Git 1.3.2 on Solaris Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-17  1:25 ` Jason Riedy
2006-05-17  2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17  3:26   ` Jason Riedy
2006-05-17  3:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17  8:05       ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-17 14:33         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 15:08           ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-17 16:24             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 16:35               ` Jason Riedy
2006-05-23  3:20                 ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-23  4:51                   ` Jason Riedy
2006-05-23 12:04                     ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-23 14:53                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-23 15:20                       ` Edgar Toernig
2006-05-23 15:31                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-23 18:43                           ` Edgar Toernig
2006-05-23 18:03                       ` Jason Riedy
2006-05-23 18:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-23 18:48                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-05-26  3:30                   ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-17  5:15     ` Ryan Anderson
2006-05-17  8:22       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17  9:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17  9:54     ` [PATCH] builtin-grep: workaround for non GNU grep Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17 14:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 17:41         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17 15:39       ` Bertrand Jacquin
2006-05-17 17:42         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17 18:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17 18:59             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17 19:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-17  8:28 ` Git 1.3.2 on Solaris Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17  9:06   ` Stefan Pfetzing
2006-05-17  9:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-17 10:41       ` Stefan Pfetzing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0605231144230.5623@g5.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=ejr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).