From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Slow fetches of tags Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20060524131022.GA11449@linux-mips.org> <7v64jv8fdx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Ralf Baechle , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 25 01:44:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj30q-0006fK-Di for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 01:43:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932080AbWEXXna (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2006 19:43:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932336AbWEXXna (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2006 19:43:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:12751 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932080AbWEXXn3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2006 19:43:29 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4ONh8tH014176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 24 May 2006 16:43:09 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4ONh3jk004337; Wed, 24 May 2006 16:43:05 -0700 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.74__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.135 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 24 May 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > IOW, I think there's something more fundamentally wrong with the tag > following. We _should_ have figured out much more quickly that we have it > all. Actually, maybe the problem is that Ralf's tree has two roots, because of the old CVS history. It might be following the other root down for the "have" part, since that one doesn't exist at all in the target and the other side will never acknowledge any of it. I'll play with it. Linus