From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/10] re-based and expanded tree-walker cleanup patches
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:15:01 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605291145360.5623@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
Ok, this is largely the same series as the previous 1..4 patches, but
rebased on top of the current master tree because the cache-tree patches
added some tree_entry_list walkers (which accounts for one extra patch in
the series, and some trivial merge fixups).
Two new patches then clean up fsck-objects, which really didn't want the
old tree_entry_list at all (and had added some hacks to the list entry
just because fsck actually needed to check the raw data).
Another two new patches convert the last remnant of tree_entry_list in
revision.c and fetch.c respectively to the new world order.
And the final patch then moves the "tree_entry_list" crud into the only
remaining user, namely builtin-read-tree.c. That file is pretty messy and
hard to convert, and I don't want to touch it right now, so I left it with
the nasty compatibility functions. But now that's at least well-contained.
I think the series is all good, and should replace the old one in "next"
(and cook there for a while just to make sure it's ok).
Linus
next reply other threads:[~2006-05-29 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-29 19:15 Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-05-29 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/10] Make "struct tree" contain the pointer to the tree buffer Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/10] Make "tree_entry" have a SHA1 instead of a union of object pointers Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/10] Switch "read_tree_recursive()" over to tree-walk functionality Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/10] builtin-read-tree.c: avoid tree_entry_list in prime_cache_tree_rec() Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:18 ` [PATCH 5/10] Remove "tree->entries" tree-entry list from tree parser Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:19 ` [PATCH 6/10] fsck-objects: avoid unnecessary tree_entry_list usage Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:19 ` [PATCH 7/10] Remove unused "zeropad" entry from tree_list_entry Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:20 ` [PATCH 8/10] Convert "mark_tree_uninteresting()" to raw tree walker Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:20 ` [PATCH 9/10] Convert fetch.c: process_tree() " Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] Remove last vestiges of generic tree_entry_list Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 22:31 ` [PATCH 0/10] re-based and expanded tree-walker cleanup patches Junio C Hamano
2006-05-30 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-30 4:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30 4:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-31 22:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-01 3:11 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-06-23 11:37 ` A series file for git? Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-23 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-24 9:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-24 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 0:44 ` Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0605291145360.5623@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).