From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] re-based and expanded tree-walker cleanup patches
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:42:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605291739430.5623@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7virno79a7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Sorry for having you have done this -- last night I've merged
> the series without rebasing and have the result in "next". I'll
> compare to see if you have spotted my mismerges there tonight.
It was interesting. I cleaned up the series and switched the order of some
commits in my tree by doing first a "git rebase" and then cherry-picking
them into another branch, and using "git commit --amend" to fix up some of
the things I had missed.
Pretty powerful, although at one point I was wondering about having a "git
rebase" that could switch commits around or drop unwanted ones (ie let the
user edit the cherry-picking list before the actual rebase).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-30 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-29 19:15 [PATCH 0/10] re-based and expanded tree-walker cleanup patches Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/10] Make "struct tree" contain the pointer to the tree buffer Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/10] Make "tree_entry" have a SHA1 instead of a union of object pointers Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/10] Switch "read_tree_recursive()" over to tree-walk functionality Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/10] builtin-read-tree.c: avoid tree_entry_list in prime_cache_tree_rec() Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:18 ` [PATCH 5/10] Remove "tree->entries" tree-entry list from tree parser Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:19 ` [PATCH 6/10] fsck-objects: avoid unnecessary tree_entry_list usage Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:19 ` [PATCH 7/10] Remove unused "zeropad" entry from tree_list_entry Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:20 ` [PATCH 8/10] Convert "mark_tree_uninteresting()" to raw tree walker Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:20 ` [PATCH 9/10] Convert fetch.c: process_tree() " Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] Remove last vestiges of generic tree_entry_list Linus Torvalds
2006-05-29 22:31 ` [PATCH 0/10] re-based and expanded tree-walker cleanup patches Junio C Hamano
2006-05-30 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-05-30 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-30 4:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30 4:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-31 22:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-01 3:11 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-06-23 11:37 ` A series file for git? Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-23 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-24 9:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-24 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 0:44 ` Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0605291739430.5623@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).