From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Figured out how to get Mozilla into git Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:14:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <9e4733910606081917l11354e49q25f0c4aea40618ea@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606082006t5c6a5623q4b9cf7b036dad1e5@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606091814n1922bf25l94d913238b260296@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910606091848r5fb4d565taabfc5198140daf2@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910606091921o1d07826w8292dc22b1872345@mail.gmail.com> <87y7w5lowc.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <448A847C.20105@dawes.za.net> <7vzmglgyz0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <448ADB8A.3070506@dawes.za.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 10 17:14:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5Ar-0007Ae-Az for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:14:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751526AbWFJPOo (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:14:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751529AbWFJPOn (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:14:43 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:39057 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbWFJPOn (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:14:43 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.108.184]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J0N00HVPH0I9510@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:14:42 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <448ADB8A.3070506@dawes.za.net> X-X-Sender: nico@localhost.localdomain To: Rogan Dawes Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Rogan Dawes wrote: > Out of curiosity, do you think that it may be possible for tree objects to > compress more/better if they are packed together? Or does the existing pack > compression logic already do the diff against similar tree objects? Tree objects for the same directories are already packed and deltified against each other in a pack. Nicolas