From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Collecting cvsps patches Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20060611122746.GB7766@nowhere.earth> <1150173310.15831.6.camel@dv> <20060613095445.GM1297@nowhere.earth> <448EC1C6.5060902@dm.cobite.com> <20060613151504.GN1297@nowhere.earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Mansfield , Pavel Roskin , GIT list , cvsps@dm.cobite.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 13 17:47:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqB70-0001er-O7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:47:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932150AbWFMPrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:47:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932152AbWFMPrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:47:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:40848 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932150AbWFMPrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:47:23 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5DFlGgt021525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:47:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k5DFlFDc031392; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:47:15 -0700 To: Yann Dirson In-Reply-To: <20060613151504.GN1297@nowhere.earth> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.75__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.135 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Yann Dirson wrote: > > I have setup a Q&D page at > http://ydirson.free.fr/en/software/scm/cvsps.html to link to. > > I'll expand it later with more information. Will you be able to set up gitweb on that site, perhaps? Also, I guess that patch I posted in the "cvsps wierdness" thread (yeah, yeah, bad spelling, but it wasn't me who started the thread) should probably be added, since it fixed at least one test-case. Although it should probably get more testing with a bigger and more real-life repository.. (David: in case you didn't follow the git list, it makes "compare_patch_sets_by_time()" compare by members _first_, and by time _second_, so that if a file revision shows that a patchset was before another one, it will use that as the primary sort order). Linus