From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Is there such a thing as a git:// proxy? Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20060618124250.15471.qmail@science.horizon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 18 19:02:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fs0fg-00012e-5D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:02:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932255AbWFRRCp (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:02:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932258AbWFRRCp (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:02:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:4326 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932255AbWFRRCo (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:02:44 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5IH2egt023894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:02:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k5IH2d5G031231; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:02:40 -0700 To: linux@horizon.com In-Reply-To: <20060618124250.15471.qmail@science.horizon.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.76__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.135 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, linux@horizon.com wrote: > > Has anyone put together something that can automatically check > upstream for updates when someone fetches from it? Well, there's actually a much easier solution: just add a "pre-pull" hook to "git-send-objects", and then have that hook check the real remote. Does anybody see any problems with that? Linus