* Remove "refs" field from "struct object"
@ 2006-06-18 18:45 Linus Torvalds
2006-06-18 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2006-06-18 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano, Git Mailing List
This shrinks "struct object" to the absolutely minimal size possible.
It now contains /only/ the object flags and the SHA1 hash name of the
object.
The "refs" field, which is really needed only for fsck, is maintained in
a separate hashed lookup-table, allowing all normal users to totally
ignore it.
This helps memory usage, although not as much as I hoped: it looks like
the allocation overhead of malloc (and the alignment constraints in
particular) means that while the structure size shrinks, the actual
allocation overhead mostly does not.
[ That said: memory usage is actually down, but not as much as it should
be: I suspect just one of the object types actually ended up shrinking
its effective allocation size.
To get to the next level, we probably need specialized allocators that
don't pad the allocation more than necessary. ]
The separation makes for some code cleanup, though, and makes the ref
tracking that fsck wants a clearly separate thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---
It turns out that removing the refs member wasn't as hard as I
anticipated: the refs usage by git-fsck-objects was very well defined, and
the actual patch to do this all is mostly the addition of the hashed
lookup and insertion (same logic as for the objects themselves), and some
very small cosmetic changes to anything that set/read the object->refs
field.
Half of the patch is moving the refs-related code to a file of its own.
I'd like to clean up some things later (make the object re-hashing be as
clean and simple as the refs re-hashing is), but wanted to keep this patch
fairly minimal and do just the refs-related changes.
The alignment problem is because the objects actually need just 4-byte
alignment on 32-bit architectures, but "malloc()" will return 8- or
16-byte aligned allocations, so we will have totally unnecessary overhead
there.
This patch will be necessary regardless - the alloction alignment is a
separate issue that just hides much of the shrinkage win.
Makefile | 2 -
fsck-objects.c | 5 +-
object-refs.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
object.c | 70 ----------------------------
object.h | 4 +-
5 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 2a1e639..244a4d1 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ LIB_OBJS = \
blob.o commit.o connect.o csum-file.o cache-tree.o base85.o \
date.o diff-delta.o entry.o exec_cmd.o ident.o lockfile.o \
object.o pack-check.o patch-delta.o path.o pkt-line.o \
- quote.o read-cache.o refs.o run-command.o dir.o \
+ quote.o read-cache.o refs.o run-command.o dir.o object-refs.o \
server-info.o setup.o sha1_file.o sha1_name.o strbuf.o \
tag.o tree.o usage.o config.o environment.o ctype.o copy.o \
fetch-clone.o revision.o pager.o tree-walk.o xdiff-interface.o \
diff --git a/fsck-objects.c b/fsck-objects.c
index 2b1aab4..769bb2a 100644
--- a/fsck-objects.c
+++ b/fsck-objects.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void check_connectivity(void)
/* Look up all the requirements, warn about missing objects.. */
for (i = 0; i < obj_allocs; i++) {
+ const struct object_refs *refs;
struct object *obj = objs[i];
if (!obj)
@@ -78,8 +79,8 @@ static void check_connectivity(void)
continue;
}
- if (obj->refs) {
- const struct object_refs *refs = obj->refs;
+ refs = lookup_object_refs(obj);
+ if (refs) {
unsigned j;
for (j = 0; j < refs->count; j++) {
struct object *ref = refs->ref[j];
diff --git a/object-refs.c b/object-refs.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8afa227
--- /dev/null
+++ b/object-refs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+#include "cache.h"
+#include "object.h"
+
+int track_object_refs = 0;
+
+static unsigned int refs_hash_size, nr_object_refs;
+static struct object_refs **refs_hash;
+
+static unsigned int hash_obj(struct object *obj, unsigned int n)
+{
+ unsigned int hash = *(unsigned int *)obj->sha1;
+ return hash % n;
+}
+
+static void grow_refs_hash(void)
+{
+ int i;
+ int new_hash_size = (refs_hash_size + 1000) * 3 / 2;
+ struct object_refs **new_hash;
+
+ new_hash = calloc(new_hash_size, sizeof(struct object_refs *));
+ for (i = 0; i < refs_hash_size; i++) {
+ int j;
+ struct object_refs *ref = refs_hash[i];
+ if (!ref)
+ continue;
+ j = hash_obj(ref->base, new_hash_size);
+ new_hash[j] = ref;
+ }
+ free(refs_hash);
+ refs_hash = new_hash;
+ refs_hash_size = new_hash_size;
+}
+
+static void insert_ref_hash(struct object_refs *ref)
+{
+ int j = hash_obj(ref->base, refs_hash_size);
+
+ while (refs_hash[j]) {
+ j++;
+ if (j >= refs_hash_size)
+ j = 0;
+ }
+ refs_hash[j] = ref;
+}
+
+static void add_object_refs(struct object *obj, struct object_refs *ref)
+{
+ int nr = nr_object_refs + 1;
+
+ if (nr > refs_hash_size * 2 / 3)
+ grow_refs_hash();
+ ref->base = obj;
+ insert_ref_hash(ref);
+ nr_object_refs = nr;
+}
+
+struct object_refs *lookup_object_refs(struct object *obj)
+{
+ int j = hash_obj(obj, refs_hash_size);
+ struct object_refs *ref;
+
+ while ((ref = refs_hash[j]) != NULL) {
+ if (ref->base == obj)
+ break;
+ j++;
+ if (j >= refs_hash_size)
+ j = 0;
+ }
+ return ref;
+}
+
+struct object_refs *alloc_object_refs(unsigned count)
+{
+ struct object_refs *refs;
+ size_t size = sizeof(*refs) + count*sizeof(struct object *);
+
+ refs = xcalloc(1, size);
+ refs->count = count;
+ return refs;
+}
+
+static int compare_object_pointers(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+ const struct object * const *pa = a;
+ const struct object * const *pb = b;
+ if (*pa == *pb)
+ return 0;
+ else if (*pa < *pb)
+ return -1;
+ else
+ return 1;
+}
+
+void set_object_refs(struct object *obj, struct object_refs *refs)
+{
+ unsigned int i, j;
+
+ /* Do not install empty list of references */
+ if (refs->count < 1) {
+ free(refs);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Sort the list and filter out duplicates */
+ qsort(refs->ref, refs->count, sizeof(refs->ref[0]),
+ compare_object_pointers);
+ for (i = j = 1; i < refs->count; i++) {
+ if (refs->ref[i] != refs->ref[i - 1])
+ refs->ref[j++] = refs->ref[i];
+ }
+ if (j < refs->count) {
+ /* Duplicates were found - reallocate list */
+ size_t size = sizeof(*refs) + j*sizeof(struct object *);
+ refs->count = j;
+ refs = xrealloc(refs, size);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < refs->count; i++)
+ refs->ref[i]->used = 1;
+ add_object_refs(obj, refs);
+}
+
+void mark_reachable(struct object *obj, unsigned int mask)
+{
+ const struct object_refs *refs;
+
+ if (!track_object_refs)
+ die("cannot do reachability with object refs turned off");
+ /* If we've been here already, don't bother */
+ if (obj->flags & mask)
+ return;
+ obj->flags |= mask;
+ refs = lookup_object_refs(obj);
+ if (refs) {
+ unsigned i;
+ for (i = 0; i < refs->count; i++)
+ mark_reachable(refs->ref[i], mask);
+ }
+}
+
+
diff --git a/object.c b/object.c
index 0f70890..e26e319 100644
--- a/object.c
+++ b/object.c
@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@ const char *type_names[] = {
"none", "blob", "tree", "commit", "bad"
};
-int track_object_refs = 0;
-
static int hashtable_index(const unsigned char *sha1)
{
unsigned int i;
@@ -55,7 +53,6 @@ void created_object(const unsigned char
obj->parsed = 0;
memcpy(obj->sha1, sha1, 20);
obj->type = TYPE_NONE;
- obj->refs = NULL;
obj->used = 0;
if (obj_allocs - 1 <= nr_objs * 2) {
@@ -84,73 +81,6 @@ void created_object(const unsigned char
nr_objs++;
}
-struct object_refs *alloc_object_refs(unsigned count)
-{
- struct object_refs *refs;
- size_t size = sizeof(*refs) + count*sizeof(struct object *);
-
- refs = xcalloc(1, size);
- refs->count = count;
- return refs;
-}
-
-static int compare_object_pointers(const void *a, const void *b)
-{
- const struct object * const *pa = a;
- const struct object * const *pb = b;
- if (*pa == *pb)
- return 0;
- else if (*pa < *pb)
- return -1;
- else
- return 1;
-}
-
-void set_object_refs(struct object *obj, struct object_refs *refs)
-{
- unsigned int i, j;
-
- /* Do not install empty list of references */
- if (refs->count < 1) {
- free(refs);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Sort the list and filter out duplicates */
- qsort(refs->ref, refs->count, sizeof(refs->ref[0]),
- compare_object_pointers);
- for (i = j = 1; i < refs->count; i++) {
- if (refs->ref[i] != refs->ref[i - 1])
- refs->ref[j++] = refs->ref[i];
- }
- if (j < refs->count) {
- /* Duplicates were found - reallocate list */
- size_t size = sizeof(*refs) + j*sizeof(struct object *);
- refs->count = j;
- refs = xrealloc(refs, size);
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < refs->count; i++)
- refs->ref[i]->used = 1;
- obj->refs = refs;
-}
-
-void mark_reachable(struct object *obj, unsigned int mask)
-{
- if (!track_object_refs)
- die("cannot do reachability with object refs turned off");
- /* If we've been here already, don't bother */
- if (obj->flags & mask)
- return;
- obj->flags |= mask;
- if (obj->refs) {
- const struct object_refs *refs = obj->refs;
- unsigned i;
- for (i = 0; i < refs->count; i++)
- mark_reachable(refs->ref[i], mask);
- }
-}
-
struct object *lookup_object_type(const unsigned char *sha1, const char *type)
{
if (!type) {
diff --git a/object.h b/object.h
index f4ee2e5..c537b4b 100644
--- a/object.h
+++ b/object.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct object_list {
struct object_refs {
unsigned count;
+ struct object *base;
struct object *ref[FLEX_ARRAY]; /* more */
};
@@ -28,7 +29,6 @@ struct object {
unsigned type : TYPE_BITS;
unsigned flags : FLAG_BITS;
unsigned char sha1[20];
- struct object_refs *refs;
};
extern int track_object_refs;
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ static inline const char *typename(unsig
return type_names[type > TYPE_TAG ? TYPE_BAD : type];
}
+extern struct object_refs *lookup_object_refs(struct object *);
+
/** Internal only **/
struct object *lookup_object(const unsigned char *sha1);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove "refs" field from "struct object"
2006-06-18 18:45 Remove "refs" field from "struct object" Linus Torvalds
@ 2006-06-18 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2006-06-18 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano, Git Mailing List
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> The "refs" field, which is really needed only for fsck, is maintained in
> a separate hashed lookup-table, allowing all normal users to totally
> ignore it.
Btw, in case people wondered: the cost to git-fsck-objects seems to be
zero and sometimes apparently even negative.
In order to remove "refs" from "struct object", I had to add it to the
object_refs structure instead, and so you'd think that the memory usage
for git-fsck-objects (which needs the object refs) should be unchanged,
while the hashed lookup should be more expensive than just the direct
pointer lookup.
Actually testing it, though, implies that isn't the case. Lots of objects
(every single blob object, in fact) have no refs at all, and for that case
we don't create any "object_refs" structure at all, so we don't actually
end up with a 1:1 relationship, and we win a small amount of memory.
And the hashing seems to be effective enough that it's no costlier than
looking up the ref pointer directly from the object. There's probably
some bad cache behaviour from the hashing, but it didn't show up in the
benchmarking I did (ie fsck took as long before as it did afterwards,
both for git and for the kernel archive).
It may be (probably is) that the reachability analysis is just a very
small portion of the overall costs, and it's just not very noticeable. It
may also be that whatever bad cache behaviours you get from the extra hash
lookup are just balanced out by the objects themselves being slightly
denser and better in the cache (although that is probably partly hidden
again by the extra malloc padding).
Regardless, there doesn't really seem to be any downsides, but I didn't
test it _that_ exhaustively.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-18 18:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-18 18:45 Remove "refs" field from "struct object" Linus Torvalds
2006-06-18 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).