From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: packs and trees Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <9e4733910606192257y1516e966t848a3b1e29e5667f@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606192313l16b16132r1523f5e05ae1566a@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606201241x3dec242dicde245a24c3ab9ab@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Jon Smirl , git X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 20 22:51:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FsnC6-0007jg-UZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:51:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751039AbWFTUvO (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:51:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751048AbWFTUvO (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:51:14 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:35265 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbWFTUvM (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:51:12 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.108.184]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J160049LF9BBVB0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:51:11 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <46a038f90606201241x3dec242dicde245a24c3ab9ab@mail.gmail.com> X-X-Sender: nico@localhost.localdomain To: Martin Langhoff Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On 6/21/06, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > > > On 6/20/06, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > The plan is to modify rcs2git from parsecvs to create all of the git > > > > objects for the tree. > > > > > > Sounds like a good plan. Have you seen recent discussions about it > > > being impossible to repack usefully when you don't have trees (and > > > resulting performance problems on ext3). > > > > What do you mean? > > I was thinking of the "repacking disconnected objects" thread, but now > I see it did have a solution in listing all the objects and paths. I > take that back. OK. Nicolas