From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A note on merging conflicts..
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:59:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606302054580.12404@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606302046230.12404@g5.osdl.org>
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> (it's not strictly a valid set operation, but it approaches being an
> "xor" instead of a union or an intersection or a difference).
Oh, I guess it _is_ perfectly valid. It's called a "symmetric difference"
in set theory.
So from a set standpoint:
Git op: Set theory:
git-rev-list a..b // difference: B - A
git-rev-list b..a // difference: A - B
git-rev-list a b // union of A B (order doesn't matter)
git-rev-list a...b // symmetric difference A B (order doesn't matter)
git-rev-list $(git-merge-base --all a b)
// intersection of A and B
I think.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-01 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 2:44 A note on merging conflicts Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-07-01 15:09 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 15:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:13 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 18:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-01 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 22:24 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 23:25 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 23:45 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 11:31 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:42 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:22 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-01 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 19:29 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add get_merge_bases_clean() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add '...' operator for revisions Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make clear_commit_marks() clean harder Rene Scharfe
2006-07-03 9:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 13:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-03 21:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 21:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 7:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 8:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 9:49 ` [PATCH 4/3] Fold get_merge_bases_clean() into get_merge_bases() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 9:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-02 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 17:40 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 20:59 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:15 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 20:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-07 8:26 ` A note on merging conflicts Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0606302054580.12404@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).