git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>,
	Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A note on merging conflicts..
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:20:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607011115500.12404@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060701180125.GA27550@fieldses.org>



On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> What's the logic behind naming the operator "..."?

Well, if ".." is set difference, why not "..." for symmetric set 
difference.

The operations really _are_ related.

Also, the parse syntax and logic really is the same, even if Rene's patch 
didn't take advantage of that.

That said, it does have a real downside, and that's simply that it can 
take a long time to compute.

Somebody should also verify that there are no interesting interaction with 
the fact that we end up traversing the commit lists twice (no object flag 
interactions etc) with the new "get_merge_bases()"

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-01 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-01  2:44 A note on merging conflicts Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01  3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01  3:54   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01  3:59     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 15:09     ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 15:23       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 16:25       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:13         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 18:01       ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-01 18:20         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-07-01 22:24           ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 22:57             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 23:25               ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 23:45                 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 11:31                   ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:42                     ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02  0:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:22         ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-01 18:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 19:29         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 19:56           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:01             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 20:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 20:07             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 20:14               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add get_merge_bases_clean() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:43                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add '...' operator for revisions Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make clear_commit_marks() clean harder Rene Scharfe
2006-07-03  9:32                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 13:56                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 17:05                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-03 21:08                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 19:47                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 21:12                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 22:55                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04  7:53                             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04  8:20                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02  9:49                 ` [PATCH 4/3] Fold get_merge_bases_clean() into get_merge_bases() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02  9:56                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-02 16:43                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 17:40                     ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 18:28                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 20:59                         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:15                           ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:17                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 20:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-07  8:26 ` A note on merging conflicts Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0607011115500.12404@g5.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).