git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>,
	Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A note on merging conflicts..
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 15:57:42 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607011552170.12404@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607011754370.9789@iabervon.org>



On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> 
> I think a...b can be computed by (in pseudocode, obviously):

Nope.

> It's basically the original merge-bases code, from way back;

And it has basically the same bug.

It is possible to have

		a
	       / \
	      b   c
	      |\ /|
	      d e f
	       \|/
		g

and clearly "e" is the only valid merge-base of b and c.

HOWEVER. It's actually possible that we traverse d, f and g before we even 
look at 'e' (because somebody had a bogus date, and 'e' _looks_ old).

Remember: in a distributed system we have no global clock, so any graph 
traversal ordering we choose is by definition always arbitrary, even 
though we can obviously _try_ to choose one that is efficient in practice 
(ie the "sort the heap by date).

So that's why git-merge-base has all that extra "unnecessary" complexity. 
You cannot output anything at all until you've guaranteed that all pending 
objects are uninteresting.

				Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-01 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-01  2:44 A note on merging conflicts Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01  3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01  3:54   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01  3:59     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 15:09     ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 15:23       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 16:25       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:13         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 18:01       ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-01 18:20         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 22:24           ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 22:57             ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-07-01 23:25               ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 23:45                 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 11:31                   ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:42                     ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02  0:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:22         ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-01 18:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 19:29         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 19:56           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:01             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 20:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 20:07             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 20:14               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add get_merge_bases_clean() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:43                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add '...' operator for revisions Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:29                 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make clear_commit_marks() clean harder Rene Scharfe
2006-07-03  9:32                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 13:56                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 17:05                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-03 21:08                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 19:47                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 21:12                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 22:55                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04  7:53                             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04  8:20                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02  9:49                 ` [PATCH 4/3] Fold get_merge_bases_clean() into get_merge_bases() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02  9:56                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-02 16:43                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 17:40                     ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 18:28                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 20:59                         ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:15                           ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:17                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 20:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-07  8:26 ` A note on merging conflicts Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0607011552170.12404@g5.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).