From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] Fold get_merge_bases_clean() into get_merge_bases()
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 09:43:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607020935460.12404@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060702094938.GA10944@lsrfire.ath.cx>
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Rene Scharfe wrote:
>
> Due to popular request ;-), change get_merge_bases() to be able to
> clean up after itself if needed by adding a cleanup parameter.
Btw, I think the symmetric thing is still wrong.
Try this:
git rev-list ^HEAD~1 HEAD...HEAD~2
which _should_ return just HEAD ("HEAD...HEAD~2" should basically expand
into "HEAD HEAD~2 ^HEAD~2")
I haven't actually tested your patch, but I think it returns HEAD and
HEAD~1.
The reason? You clear UNINTERESTING as part of clear_commit_marks(), so
HEAD~1, which was marked thus by the user, gets cleared of its mark as
part of the get_merge_bases() invocation.
I suspect the only way to fix that is to make "get_merge_bases()" not use
UNINTERESTING at all, but instead just explicitly use something like
(obj.flags & (LEFT | RIGHT)) == (LEFT | RIGHT)
instead.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-02 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 2:44 A note on merging conflicts Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 15:09 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 15:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:13 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 18:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-01 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 22:24 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 23:25 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-01 23:45 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 11:31 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:42 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-07-02 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:22 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-01 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 19:29 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-01 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add get_merge_bases_clean() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add '...' operator for revisions Rene Scharfe
2006-07-01 23:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make clear_commit_marks() clean harder Rene Scharfe
2006-07-03 9:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 13:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-03 21:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-03 21:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-03 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 7:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 8:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 9:49 ` [PATCH 4/3] Fold get_merge_bases_clean() into get_merge_bases() Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 9:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-02 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-07-02 17:40 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-02 20:59 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:15 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-07-02 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-02 20:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-07 8:26 ` A note on merging conflicts Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0607020935460.12404@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).