From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: git-fetch per-repository speed issues Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1151949764.4723.51.camel@neko.keithp.com> <1151973438.4723.70.camel@neko.keithp.com> <7vsllinj1m.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 04 05:41:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxbmX-0000kv-37 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:41:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750991AbWGDDkt (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:40:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751292AbWGDDkt (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:40:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:2449 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbWGDDks (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:40:48 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k643einW014444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:40:45 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k643eh1d015065; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:40:44 -0700 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vsllinj1m.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.81__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.135 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Isn't that because the repository have 32 subprojects, totally > unrelated content-wise? If you have real stuff to pull from > there your pack generation needs to do 32 time as much work as > you would for a single head in that case. No, Keith said this was for the case where the fetching repository is already totally up-to-date: "And, it's painfully slow, even when the repository is up to date" and gave a 17-second time. Linus