From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-pack --keep: do not explode into loose objects on the receiving end. Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:44:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7vwt6j4l77.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061029075638.GB3847@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-reply-to: <20061029075638.GB3847@spearce.org> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeMCC-0002Cy-MU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:44:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030482AbWJ3BoF (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:44:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030483AbWJ3BoF (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:44:05 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:44794 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030482AbWJ3BoD (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:44:03 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J7X00021E5EO6C0@VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:44:02 -0500 (EST) To: Shawn Pearce Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > This adds "keep-pack" extension to send-pack vs receive pack protocol, > > and makes the receiver invoke "index-pack --stdin --fix-thin". > > I'm torn on this. I see that keeping a pack vs. exploding to loose > objects is a local repository decision and thus should be determined > by the receiving repository, not the sending one. I second this. I think it is really not the remote end's business to decide what the local storage policy is, and vice versa.