From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7virhhy76h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200611150917.23756.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vfyckoaju.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-reply-to: <7vfyckoaju.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkPEc-00020B-QT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:11:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030797AbWKOSLj (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030800AbWKOSLj (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:39 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:34911 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030797AbWKOSLi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:38 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J8S00366AJC9HL0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:37 -0500 (EST) To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > > But again I think it is important that the URL to use must be a per > > branch attribute i.e. attached to "default/master" and not just > > "default". This way someone could add all branches of interest into the > > "default" group even if they're from different repositories, and a > > simple get without any argument would get them all. > > I think the "one group per one remote repository" model is a lot > easier to explain. At least when I read your first "branch > group" proposal that was I thought was going on and I found it > quite sensible (and it maps more or less straightforwardly to > the way existing .git/refs/remotes is set up by default). I think one group per remote repo is how things should be by default too. But we should not limit it to that if possible.