From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: git and bzr Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <87slhcz8zh.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7vu01ro20b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061026101038.GA13310@coredump.intra.peff.net> <877iyne4dm.fsf@alplog.fr> <456B7C6A.80104@webdrake.net> <845b6e870611280410j58bdcd99nc05d0f67489293e4@mail.gmail.com> <456C7592.6020700@ableton.com> <456C9DFF.1040407@onlinehome.de> <456CA981.4010808@onlinehome.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jakub Narebski , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <456CA981.4010808@onlinehome.de> X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.161 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpApv-0007A3-9p for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:49:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757080AbWK1Vtw (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:49:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757076AbWK1Vtw (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:49:52 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:43170 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757078AbWK1Vtv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:49:51 -0500 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id kASLniix005417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:44 -0800 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kASLnhe3027122; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:43 -0800 To: Nicholas Allen Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Nicholas Allen wrote: > > and here's how it looked in git: > git status Ehh. It told you exactly what happened when you actually did the merge, didn't it? Yeah, "git status" won't tell you _why_ it results in unmerged paths, but the merge will have told you. You must have seen that, but decided to just ignore it and not post it, because it didn't support the conclusion you wanted to get, did it? There are lots of reasons why "git status" may tell you that something isn't merged. The most common one by far being an actual data conflict, not a name conflict. The reason for why something conflicts is always told at merge-time.