From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:30:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <200612102011.52589.jnareb@gmail.com> <200612102127.05894.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jeff Garzik , Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rogan Dawes , Kernel Org Admin Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <200612102127.05894.jnareb@gmail.com> X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.162 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtVKs-0007n5-RW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:31:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762488AbWLJUbi (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:31:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762489AbWLJUbi (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:31:38 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:59213 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762486AbWLJUbh (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:31:37 -0500 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id kBAKUoID019729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:30:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kBAKUnlX002340; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:30:49 -0800 To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > Well, the idea (perhaps stupid idea: I don't know how caching engines > / reverse proxy works) was that there would be caching engine / reverse > proxy in the front (Squid for example) would cache results and serve it > to rampaging hordes. Sure, if the proxies actually do the rigth thing (which they may or may not do) > What about the other idea, the one with raising expires to infinity for > immutable pages like "commit" view for commit given by SHA-1? Even if > the clients won't cache it, the proxies and caches between gitweb and > client might cache it... I agree, but as mentioned, I think the _real_ problem tends to be the pages that don't act that way (ie summary pages, both at the individual project level and the top "all projects" level).