From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] CGit v0.1-pre Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:04:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <8c5c35580612101542n72d300c7o106e53e219670510@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580612101542n72d300c7o106e53e219670510@mail.gmail.com> X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.162 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtZar-0000Du-Ol for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:04:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762627AbWLKBEW (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:04:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762632AbWLKBEW (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:04:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:55620 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762627AbWLKBEV (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:04:21 -0500 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id kBB14GID003635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:04:19 -0800 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kBB14Frr008985; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:04:16 -0800 To: Lars Hjemli Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Lars Hjemli wrote: > > For a quick summary of the cache algorithm, the project README is here: > > http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/view/?id=5917c37ce30b3f0a374c9fa376955f51f1d7bfbf Your pseudo-algorithm is dubious: name = generate_cache_name(request); top: if (!exists(name)) { if (lock_cache(name)) { generate_cache(request, name); unlock_cache(name); } else { sched_yield(); goto top; } } else if (expired(name)) { if (lock_cache(name)) { generate_cache(request, name); unlock_cache(name); } } print_file(name); You really should have: if (!exists) { if (!lock) delay-and-repeat; /* RETEST exists _after_ getting the lock */ if (!exists) { generate into lock-file mv lockfile exists; } else { rm lockfile } } because you really want to re-check the existence after you got the lock, otherwise you would race with somebody else that got the lock, generated the data, and then unlocked (and you got the lock _after_ the data was generated, so now you generate it unnecessarily). As a side note: how do you release your caches?