git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Cc: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>,
	Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC \ WISH] Add -o option to git-rev-list
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:40:37 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612111238560.3515@woody.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612112128.06485.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>



On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> 
> A general question: How many context switches are involved in such
> a producer/consumer scenario, given that the consumer writes one
> line at a time, and the consumer uses poll/select to wait for the
> data?
> Is there some possibility to make the kernel write-combine single
> small producer writes into bigger chunks, which will be delivered
> at once (or smaller data only after a small timeout)?

The data will be write-combined.

The kernel doesn't context-switch after a write() to a pipe if there is 
space left (and usually the pipe buffer is 64kB with current kernels, so 
there obviously will be), unless the reader has a higher priority for some 
reason (ie the reader has been waiting a long time).

So _normally_ you'll see many many writes in one go, and only see context 
switching when the kernel pipe buffer fills up.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-11 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-10 11:38 [RFC \ WISH] Add -o option to git-rev-list Marco Costalba
2006-12-10 14:54 ` Alex Riesen
2006-12-10 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 19:51   ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-10 20:00     ` globs in partial checkout? Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-12-10 20:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 21:07         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-12-10 20:08     ` [RFC \ WISH] Add -o option to git-rev-list Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 20:19       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:05         ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-10 22:09           ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-10 22:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:35             ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-10 22:53               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11  0:15                 ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11  0:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11  7:17                     ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 10:00                       ` Alex Riesen
2006-12-11 16:59                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 17:07                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 17:39                           ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 18:15                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 18:59                               ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 19:25                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 20:28                                 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-12-11 20:40                                   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-12-11 20:54                                     ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-12-11 21:14                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-15 18:45                                         ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-15 19:20                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-15 20:41                                             ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-15 21:04                                               ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11  9:26                   ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-12-11 12:52                     ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 13:28                       ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-12-11 17:28                         ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 11:39     ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-12-11 12:59       ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-11 13:40         ` Andreas Ericsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612111238560.3515@woody.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=mcostalba@gmail.com \
    --cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).