From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>,
Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@bellsouth.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: Updated Kernel Hacker's guide to git
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:13:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612212009370.3536@woody.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87slf83erg.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:23:30 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > In short, for git diff (and ONLY) git diff, all of these are the same:
> >
> > git diff a..b
> > git diff a b
>
> I admit that I had had never passed a range of commits to git diff,
> nor even given any thought to what it might do, but I definitely find
> the above very surprising---and not necessarily very useful. Why is
> anyone ever typing those two dots here if they have no effect on the
> result?
I do it all the time, I never even use the old-fashioned syntax any more.
It's much more concise and easy to read, and it has all the nice shortcuts
(like empty meaning "HEAD", so you can do "git diff ..next" to see the
diff from HEAD to another branch).
It's also useful exactly because of the semantics of things like "...".
In other words, sure, "git diff a b" works, but it just _looks_ more
pleasing to use "a..b" and you mentally always pronounce the ".." as "to".
So "git diff a b" doesn't even look good to me any more, because it's
literally missing that mental "to" that the ".." adds for me when I read
it.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-22 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-21 12:24 Updated Kernel Hacker's guide to git Francis Moreau
2006-12-21 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-22 1:23 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-22 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-12-22 22:20 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-22 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-22 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-22 23:31 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-22 23:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-22 9:35 ` Francis Moreau
2006-12-22 10:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-22 20:34 ` Francis Moreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-21 3:04 Jeff Garzik
2006-12-21 3:21 ` Jay Cliburn
2006-12-21 7:04 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-12-21 7:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-21 7:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-21 11:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-21 5:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-21 5:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-12-21 11:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-21 21:17 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-12-21 13:53 ` Francois Romieu
2006-12-21 20:40 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-12-21 20:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-22 8:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-12-24 18:07 ` Horst H. von Brand
2007-12-23 11:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-23 12:08 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-12-23 12:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-23 12:20 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-12-23 13:05 ` Dieter Ries
2007-12-23 17:23 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-12-23 20:14 ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-24 14:19 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-12-23 12:25 ` WANG Cong
2007-12-24 12:50 ` Miklos Vajna
2007-12-25 13:08 ` Salikh Zakirov
2007-12-31 2:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-31 11:26 ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-31 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-30 2:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-30 6:27 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-30 2:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-03 6:26 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612212009370.3536@woody.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=cworth@cworth.org \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jacliburn@bellsouth.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).