From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:21:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7vtzzfp86x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 30 04:21:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0Umk-00050z-91 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:21:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030229AbWL3DVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030231AbWL3DVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:21:22 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:10059 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030229AbWL3DVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:21:22 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JB2001RBHBK5EG0@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:21:21 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Johannes Schindelin Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > * jc/3way (Wed Nov 29 18:53:13 2006 -0800) 1 commit > > + git-merge: preserve and merge local changes when doing fast > > forward > > I'd like this, but behind a command line switch. And in addition to saying > "cannot merge, blabla needs update", git could spit out "if you want to > risk a 3way merge, go ahead and add the --preserve-local flag to > git-merge". > > Comments? Is there really a point for not always doing it? IOW, if you really want a command line switch, maybe it should be used to prevent the above not to allow it? Nicolas