From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Default "tar" umask..
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:45:23 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612301037570.4473@woody.osdl.org> (raw)
We just had a posting on the kernel security list where a person was
upset that the 2.6.19.1 and .2 tar-files were apparently group and
world-writable.
Now, the default kernel releases don't do that (at least any more),
because I've got
[tar]
umask=022
in my git config file these days, but the stable team apparently doesn't.
Looking at some of the tar-files I have lying around, they all seem to
have used that 022 umask, and maybe we should just change the git default
to that?
Anybody who wants to, can get the zero umask by just using the config
file, but maybe the default should be the common case, and the case that
isn't as likely to be a security issue if you untar it.
GNU tar has a "--no-same-permissions" flag to use the user umask at untar
time, but I think that's a GNU-tar specific feature (at least I can't see
any short flag to do the same), and I have to admit that I've _never_ used
it even though I've used "tar" a long time, so at least going by my
personal experience, I'd say it's very uncommon for people to use it.
The trivial untested patch below should do it.
Linus
---
diff --git a/archive-tar.c b/archive-tar.c
index af47fdc..d4a2fa4 100644
--- a/archive-tar.c
+++ b/archive-tar.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static char block[BLOCKSIZE];
static unsigned long offset;
static time_t archive_time;
-static int tar_umask;
+static int tar_umask = 022;
static int verbose;
/* writes out the whole block, but only if it is full */
next reply other threads:[~2006-12-30 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-30 18:45 Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-12-30 19:27 ` Default "tar" umask Junio C Hamano
2007-01-05 20:39 ` René Scharfe
2007-01-05 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-01-05 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-05 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-01-07 15:20 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-01-07 21:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-01-05 22:30 ` René Scharfe
2007-01-05 22:40 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612301037570.4473@woody.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).