From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git.txt: command re-classification Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:44:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7v1wlrle61.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vbqkufyhy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vps9aeghh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 20 02:44:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H85H6-0007Ls-EO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:44:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965094AbXATBoF (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:44:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965098AbXATBoF (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:44:05 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:39905 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965094AbXATBoE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:44:04 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JC5001LH8TDLWE0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:44:02 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <7vps9aeghh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > annotate is already ancillary and blame also is. Do you want to > promote one of them to mainporcelain? I'd think so. > > Is git-show-branch really a primary command? > > Ah, I didn't notice that you wanted to move it out of > mainporcelain in your patch. > > I personally use it quite often while juggling topics, > especially since I do not usually work inside X, but I'm fine > either way -- ancillaryinterrogators? Sure. > Ok, then how about this on top of what you saw on the list. I'd put fsck-objects in ancillaryinterrogators. Otherwise it looks fine. Nicolas