From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: More precise tag following Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:02:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <7vy7nqxd08.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070127080126.GC9966@spearce.org> <7vzm84gmei.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vps8zfqlx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vveirdkpb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vodog3m3f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 30 18:02:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBwN5-00040c-L7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:02:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965628AbXA3RCI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965629AbXA3RCI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:38186 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965628AbXA3RCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:07 -0500 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0UH221m015882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:02:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l0UH20CY023110; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:02:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <7vodog3m3f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.464 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.111__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.172 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > This is still very rough; the existing diff frontends are mess > and making diff-cache and diff-tree behave more or less > interchangeably is quite a pain. Ahh. If it's that painful, then perhaps it's not worth it. It was just a "wouldn't it be nice" - I don't think anybody will really *depend* on this kind of politeness.. Linus