From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: cleaner/better zlib sources? Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <45F9EED5.3070706@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff Garzik , Git Mailing List , mpm@selenic.com, bcrl@kvack.org To: Davide Libenzi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 16 03:56:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HS2cQ-00083Z-S0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:56:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752701AbXCPC4g (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752712AbXCPC4g (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:56:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:50755 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752701AbXCPC4f (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:56:35 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l2G2uKcD002944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:56:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l2G2uJeJ000956; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:56:20 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.485 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.119__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.176 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > That's the diff against 1.2.3, but it does not seem to make an substantial > difference in my Opteron ... But the "goto" stuff you did is 5-6%? Is that 5-6% of total git costs, or just of inflate() itself? Linus