From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <118833cc0703171814n4e56ab9fwfaaea81c903ae235@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Morten Welinder , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 18 02:56:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HSkcy-0005Oa-Cj for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 02:56:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752902AbXCRBzz (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:55:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752899AbXCRBzz (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:55:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:52337 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752895AbXCRBzy (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:55:54 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l2I1tccD018146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:55:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l2I1tbOc013764; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:55:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.977 required=5 tests=AWL,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.119__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.176 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > This is definitely an area where pack v4 will bring that cost down to > zero. Heh. I believe that when I see it. The thing is, unless you re-generate the tree object data structures, you'll have to have totally different tree walkers for different tree types, and it will all be quite ugly and complex. And "ugly and complex" seldom translates into "zero cost". Linus