From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: git 1.5.1-rc1 doesn't like empty files Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1174361424.3143.42.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Roskin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 20 05:54:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HTWMO-0006p4-Q3 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:54:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933993AbXCTEyK (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:54:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933994AbXCTEyK (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:54:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:46270 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933993AbXCTEyI (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:54:08 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l2K4s2cD022877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:54:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l2K4s16W026042; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:54:02 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1174361424.3143.42.camel@dv> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.477 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.119__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.176 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > I don't know where this problem appeared, but it present in the current > git (1.5.1-rc1). Empty files become invalid objects in the repository: Hmm.. Not for me. Can you bisect when it started happening? > This is Linux, Fedora Development, i386. FC6, tested both i386 and x86-64. I wonder if this is a zlib issue. Although I seem to have libz-1.2.3 on both machines, and that should be the most recent version. I don't see Fedora development having anything else.. Linus