From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] Avoid unnecessary strlen() calls Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <7v8xdunavr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3b40d2os.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070320043902.GB29288@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Nicolas Pitre , Morten Welinder , Git Mailing List To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 20 05:58:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HTWQ4-00007t-2P for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:58:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933999AbXCTE5Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:57:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934004AbXCTE5Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:57:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:46365 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933999AbXCTE5W (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:57:22 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l2K4v3cD022959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:57:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l2K4v2YR026102; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:57:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20070320043902.GB29288@spearce.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.977 required=5 tests=AWL,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.119__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.176 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Btw, Dscho's slightly more invasive patch seems to *just* edge out Nico's > > one-liner for me, with best-of-ten being 6.17s. > > Uh, instead of Nico here don't you mean DrNick on #git? He is in > real life Nicholas Miell. Google says he's somewhat active in the > kernel world, so maybe you know him? ;-) I actually meant you. For some reason, I confuse you and Nico. I've done it several times, and even without any DrNick mention. Time to take my meds, Linus