From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
Subject: Re: SEGV in git-merge recursive:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703291232190.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070329183237.GB2809@steel.home>
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Alex Riesen wrote:
>
> tree == 0x0? Strange, I don't get why it is NULL, the initial commit
> definitely hase a tree (git cat-file -p initial-commit shows a tree
> name and there is a tree with that object name).
It's not the initial commit. It's a criss-cross merge, and it's a virtual
commit created by a previous level of merging.
Apply this patch to see it blow up much earlier, when that bogus commit
with a NULL tree is created.
(I didn't debug *why* that happens, but maybe this gets somebody further)
Linus
---
merge-recursive.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index c96e1a7..28f0c30 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static struct commit *make_virtual_commit(struct tree *tree, const char *comment
{
struct commit *commit = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct commit));
static unsigned virtual_id = 1;
+ assert(tree);
commit->tree = tree;
commit->util = (void*)comment;
*(int*)commit->object.sha1 = virtual_id++;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-29 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-29 7:50 SEGV in git-merge recursive: Tom Prince
2007-03-29 8:18 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 8:32 ` Tom Prince
2007-03-29 11:29 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 12:58 ` Tom Prince
2007-03-29 13:34 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 14:12 ` Tom Prince
2007-03-29 14:44 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 14:45 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 15:04 ` Tom Prince
2007-03-29 15:04 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 18:32 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 18:55 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 23:01 ` [PATCH] An attempt to resolve a rename/rename conflict in recursive merge Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 23:13 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-29 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-03-29 19:40 ` SEGV in git-merge recursive: Linus Torvalds
2007-03-29 20:44 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-30 21:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-31 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-31 1:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-31 10:49 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-31 11:49 ` [PATCH] Keep rename/rename conflicts of intermediate merges while doing recursive merge Alex Riesen
2007-03-31 12:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-31 12:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-31 12:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-31 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-31 17:34 ` Alex Riesen
2007-03-31 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-31 11:22 ` SEGV in git-merge recursive: Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-29 19:55 ` Tom Prince
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703291232190.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=tom.prince@ualberta.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).