From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:37:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20070417104520.GB4946@moonlight.home> <8b65902a0704170841q64fe0828mdefe78963394a616@mail.gmail.com> <200704171818.28256.andyparkins@gmail.com> <20070417173007.GV2229@spearce.org> <462521C7.2050103@softax.com.pl> <46d6db660704190522k29bc65e2x9f8d00707dc381a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linus Torvalds , Marcin Kasperski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Christian MICHON X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 19 14:37:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeVss-0002iv-A2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:37:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993218AbXDSMhG (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:37:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993219AbXDSMhF (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:37:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56628 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S2993218AbXDSMhE (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:37:04 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2007 12:37:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp043) with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 14:37:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/bVGNdpYfbPEDoJT2kRvja/H+bCxmSdcouYekkdY MN/IJt3wleBd6F X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <46d6db660704190522k29bc65e2x9f8d00707dc381a3@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Christian MICHON wrote: > On 4/19/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Given the fact that Hannes is working not only _on_, but _with_ it, > > tells me that it works well enough for any Windows user (remember, > > they are used to rebooting their machines several times a day, just to > > keep them running). > > untrue, but very funny :) Oh, but it is true! That's personal experience. My typical answer: "You needed to reboot? What is a 'reboot'?" > My experience (offtopic, I know): > > In one day, I actually reboot more often my qemu instances with my linux > test kernels than the current XP host crashes in a year. With a linux test kernel. Yeah, right. So, you compare an experimental test kernel -- which I gather you stress test? -- with an XP kernel where you probably do not even check mails while running QEmu, for fear that it crashes? *lol*! Ciao, Dscho