From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Barkalow Subject: Anybody using git-send-pack? Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:29:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 23 19:29:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hg2MH-0001Lc-68 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:29:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751672AbXDWR3q (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:29:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753820AbXDWR3p (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:29:45 -0400 Received: from iabervon.org ([66.92.72.58]:2377 "EHLO iabervon.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751672AbXDWR3o (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:29:44 -0400 Received: (qmail 7067 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Apr 2007 17:29:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 17:29:43 -0000 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: In order to make git-push update refs/remotes to reflect the change caused to the remote (without requiring a fetch after the push), I'm finding it necessary to mess with the interface between git-push and git-send-pack. I think the easiest thing would be just to pull send-pack into push, rather than execing another program (now that git-push is also in C). The question is whether I should write a builtin-send-pack.c that lets people call send-pack directly, or get rid of it entirely in favor of always going though git-push. The only reason I can see to call send-pack directly is that git-push currently loses "verbose" in calling it, which should probably just be fixed. Is cogito still using it, perhaps? Is that still an issue? -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*