From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Make xstrndup common
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:12:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301508550.29859@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4635003F.7080408@freedesktop.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >>> It was implemented in commit.c; move it with the other x memory functions.
> >> [...]
> >>> +static inline char *xstrndup(const char *str, int len)
> >>> +{
> >>> + char *ret = xmalloc(len + 1);
> >>> + memcpy(ret, str, len);
> >>> + ret[len] = '\0';
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >> I don't know if it matters, but this definition of xstrndup, like the
> >> version in commit.c, doesn't match the definition of strndup.
> >> strndup duplicates a string, copying up to n characters or the length
> >> of the string. This xstrndup always copies n characters, reading
> >> past the end of the string if it doesn't have at least n characters.
> >
> > Good catch. Replacing the memcpy with strncpy solves this, right?
> > (Potentially allocating a bit of extra memory if someone is actually
> > using it on too short a string for some reason, of course).
>
> That would work, but it seems bad to allocate excess memory. How about
> just using strlen and setting len to that if shorter, before doing the
> xmalloc and memcpy? Yes, that makes two passes over the string, but I
> don't see any way around that.
Unless I am missing something, I think this should work:
static inline char *xstrndup(const char *str, int len)
{
char *result = strndup(str, len);
if (result == NULL)
die ("xstrndup(): out of memory");
return result;
}
Hmm?
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: If you feel real paranoid about it, you might insert
if (result == NULL) {
release_pack_memory(len, -1);
result = strndup(str, len);
}
before the if (...), but I think that's overkill.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-30 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 18:53 [PATCH 1/5] Make xstrndup common Josh Triplett
2007-04-28 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-29 18:19 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-04-29 20:29 ` Josh Triplett
2007-04-29 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-29 20:40 ` Adam Roben
2007-04-30 13:12 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2007-04-30 20:50 ` Jeff King
2007-04-30 22:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-28 17:05 Daniel Barkalow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301508550.29859@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).