From: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
To: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
releases@openoffice.org, Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:51:34 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021046230.2425@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705020955.04582.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
> On Tuesday 2007 May 01, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
>> In 'Size of data on the server' git has CVS beat hands down: 1.3G vs
>> 8.5G for sources, 591M vs 1.1G for third party. I think it is similar
>> for Subversion. I hope that repository is fully packed: IIRC the Mozilla
>> CVS repository import was about 0.6GB pack file, not 1.3GB.
>
> I'm fairly sure it's not. If so that would also affect the speed of
> operations wouldn't it?
A fully packed clone of the OOo git repo was indeed 1.3G, and the entrire
checkout + repo was indeed 8.5G (using git 1.5.1.2).
Took about 46m to clone on a server with decent bandwith, ~5.5m user time,
~1.5m system.
>
> I also doubt the subversion checkout size - subversion keeps a pristine copy
> of the HEAD file - so a subversion checkout is usually over twice the size of
> the source tree.
>
>> takes 3min (!) according to the benchmark. 13-25sec for commit is also
>> bit long
>
> I wonder if they are measuring the time for the generation of the commit
> message or something? Or perhaps by using "git-commit -a" is causing a check
> of the whole tree for changed files?
>
>> Comparison / benchmark lacks some crucial info, like what computer was
>> used (CPU, RAM, HDD), what filesystem was used, git version etc. It
>> does have commands used for tests (benchmarks).
>
> I'd also like to see some of the numbers for the other systems, I tried to use
> subversion with the linux kernel once and got fed up waiting for it to do
> anything. I suspect the reason numbers aren't shown for the others is that
> they haven't finished yet :-)
>
>> Could you confirm (or deny) those results? go-oo.org uses git 1.4.3.4;
>> was there some improvement or bugfix related to the speed of checkout?
>
> Wasn't there a recent change that made repacking after a clone unnecessary?
> That would certainly reduce the checkout size.
Not from the numbers that are quoted it won't, they are fully packed
sizes.
--
Julian
---
"Do you have blacks, too?"
George W. Bush
To Brazilian president Fernando Cardoso
November 8, 2001
Washington, D.C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 21:46 Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Jakub Narebski
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 8:55 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 9:51 ` Julian Phillips [this message]
2007-05-02 10:58 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 14:28 ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 15:30 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:11 ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 14:37 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 15:33 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 11:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-02 14:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-05 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-07 8:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-07 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-02 14:41 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 14:24 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 14:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 16:15 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:27 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:37 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:48 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 23:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 11:51 ` [tools-dev] " Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-03 12:54 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-03 15:14 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-04 0:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 7:03 ` Florian Weimer
2007-05-03 9:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-03 10:16 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 10:48 ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-06 20:05 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 23:36 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021046230.2425@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk \
--to=julian@quantumfyre.co.uk \
--cc=andyparkins@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=kendy@suse.cz \
--cc=releases@openoffice.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).