git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
To: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
	releases@openoffice.org, Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:51:34 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021046230.2425@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705020955.04582.andyparkins@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:

> On Tuesday 2007 May 01, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
>> In 'Size of data on the server' git has CVS beat hands down: 1.3G vs
>> 8.5G for sources, 591M vs 1.1G for third party. I think it is similar
>> for Subversion. I hope that repository is fully packed: IIRC the Mozilla
>> CVS repository import was about 0.6GB pack file, not 1.3GB.
>
> I'm fairly sure it's not.  If so that would also affect the speed of
> operations wouldn't it?

A fully packed clone of the OOo git repo was indeed 1.3G, and the entrire 
checkout + repo was indeed 8.5G (using git 1.5.1.2).

Took about 46m to clone on a server with decent bandwith, ~5.5m user time, 
~1.5m system.

>
> I also doubt the subversion checkout size - subversion keeps a pristine copy
> of the HEAD file - so a subversion checkout is usually over twice the size of
> the source tree.
>
>> takes 3min (!) according to the benchmark. 13-25sec for commit is also
>> bit long
>
> I wonder if they are measuring the time for the generation of the commit
> message or something?  Or perhaps by using "git-commit -a" is causing a check
> of the whole tree for changed files?
>
>> Comparison / benchmark lacks some crucial info, like what computer was
>> used (CPU, RAM, HDD), what filesystem was used, git version etc. It
>> does have commands used for tests (benchmarks).
>
> I'd also like to see some of the numbers for the other systems, I tried to use
> subversion with the linux kernel once and got fed up waiting for it to do
> anything.  I suspect the reason numbers aren't shown for the others is that
> they haven't finished yet :-)
>
>> Could you confirm (or deny) those results? go-oo.org uses git 1.4.3.4;
>> was there some improvement or bugfix related to the speed of checkout?
>
> Wasn't there a recent change that made repacking after a clone unnecessary?
> That would certainly reduce the checkout size.

Not from the numbers that are quoted it won't, they are fully packed 
sizes.

-- 
Julian

  ---
"Do you have blacks, too?"

George W. Bush
To Brazilian president Fernando Cardoso
November 8, 2001
Washington, D.C.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-02  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01 21:46 Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Jakub Narebski
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02  8:55 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02  9:51   ` Julian Phillips [this message]
2007-05-02 10:58     ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 14:28       ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 15:30         ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:11           ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 14:37       ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 15:33         ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 11:33   ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-02 14:55     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-05  3:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-07  8:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-07 15:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-02 14:41   ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:24     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 14:24 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 14:35   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 16:15   ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:27     ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:37       ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:48         ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 23:30   ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 11:51     ` [tools-dev] " Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-03 12:54       ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-03 15:14       ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-04  0:48       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03  7:03 ` Florian Weimer
2007-05-03  9:33   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-03 10:16     ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 10:48       ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-06 20:05         ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 23:36       ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021046230.2425@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --to=julian@quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --cc=andyparkins@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=kendy@suse.cz \
    --cc=releases@openoffice.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).