From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Support ent:relative_path Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <463BD40C.6080909@gmail.com> <7vwszolz26.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <56b7f5510705042346s759a2ef9tfa3a223fe7af7c16@mail.gmail.com> <7vwszmfod8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Dana How , Git Mailing List , "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 06 17:15:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkiS6-0004R9-F1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 17:15:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750893AbXEFPPA (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 11:15:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751555AbXEFPPA (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 11:15:00 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47557 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750893AbXEFPO7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 11:14:59 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 May 2007 15:14:57 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp039) with SMTP; 06 May 2007 17:14:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19t2/IyRH5t84BQwqQ/vZtXomOzQOQClMrp1A1fOH DGmlLYF8w1r5g/ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vwszmfod8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 5 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > >> (a) In a bare repository, I believe > >> setup.c:setup_git_directory_gently() determines the prefix to be > >> NULL. This means my patch will see ALL paths as absolute, except > >> :../path which will result in an error. > > > > My point was that it feels inconsistent to take the current path into > > account in one case, but not in the other. > > I do not understand your reasoning. In a bare repository you cannot > even be in a subdirectory to begin with. Exactly! That is my point. If you can do it in a working directory, but also with a bare repository, I find it highly confusing and inconsistent to have different meaning. Ciao, Dscho