From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Win32 version, was Re: quick bare clones taking longer? Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <7virb1sm6h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070509.150256.59469756.davem@davemloft.net> <7v3b25siwk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070509.162301.48802460.davem@davemloft.net> <7vy7jxr35a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vd519r10c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vejlpkruy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <2FFB6305-AB01-4C78-9831-18522C0FFE79@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailing List To: Brian Gernhardt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 12 17:26:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HmtTy-0008U9-0X for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:26:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752696AbXELP0A (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 11:26:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754672AbXELP0A (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 11:26:00 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44570 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752696AbXELPZ7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 11:25:59 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 May 2007 15:25:57 -0000 Received: from R0a8c.r.pppool.de (EHLO noname) [89.54.10.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 12 May 2007 17:25:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19LVd0M6L1L0VUIEx6Yfafo7wHQO2Ebh0ne1n3d1u 5qaA5hZ5mCVQB5 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <2FFB6305-AB01-4C78-9831-18522C0FFE79@silverinsanity.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 10 May 2007, Brian Gernhardt wrote: > Someday Git may work on Windows without a funny (for MS) environment. > But that day is not today. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. ;-) It sure sounds like you would like that day rather sooner than later. In related news, that day will be sooner rather than later, if people who actually care deeply about this _do_ something about it. Hth, Dscho