From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Dana How <danahow@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent megablobs from gunking up git packs
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:38:46 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705241038030.4648@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070524071235.GL28023@spearce.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> > "Dana How" <danahow@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > The packed X too big combination is the problem. As the
> > > commit message says, this could happen if the packs
> > > came from fast-import,...
> > > We have three options in this case:
> > > (1) Drop the object (do not put it in the new pack(s)).
> > > (2) Pass the object into the new pack(s).
> > > (3) Write out the object as a new loose object.
> > >
> > > Option (1) is unacceptable. When you call git-repack -a,
> > > it blindly deletes all the non-kept packs at the end. So
> > > the megablobs would be lost.
> >
> > Ok, I can buy that -- (1) nor (2) are unacceptable and (3) is
> > the only sane thing to do for a previously packed objects that
> > exceed the size limit.
>
> I still don't buy the idea that these megablobs shouldn't be packed.
> I understand Dana's pain here (at least a little bit, my problems
> aren't as bad as his are), but I also hate to see us run away from
> packfiles for these really sick cases just because we have some
> issues in our current packfile handling.
Isn't this issue helpable by the "-delta" attribute?
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-24 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 6:14 [PATCH] Prevent megablobs from gunking up git packs Dana How
2007-05-22 6:30 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-22 7:33 ` Dana How
2007-05-22 6:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-22 8:00 ` Dana How
2007-05-22 11:05 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-22 16:59 ` Dana How
2007-05-22 23:44 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-23 0:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-23 1:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-22 17:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-22 18:07 ` Dana How
2007-05-23 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-23 23:55 ` Dana How
2007-05-24 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-24 7:12 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-24 9:38 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2007-05-24 17:23 ` david
2007-05-24 17:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-25 0:55 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-24 20:43 ` Geert Bosch
2007-05-24 23:29 ` Dana How
2007-05-25 2:06 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-25 5:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705241038030.4648@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=danahow@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).