From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: GIT on MinGW problem Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:52:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1dbc01c79432$b4400a80$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <464534EE.30904@xs4all.nl> <4656A304.AF39A0B6@eudaptics.com> <46588DA4.5020109@xs4all.nl> <46592B92.9060403@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Han-Wen Nienhuys X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 27 12:52:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HsGMY-0005ZW-Nz for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 12:52:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750790AbXE0Kwe (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 06:52:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751154AbXE0Kwe (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 06:52:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55771 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750790AbXE0Kwd (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 06:52:33 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 May 2007 10:52:31 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 27 May 2007 12:52:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+RH+VA2p6R10tmifRBRMjKWjzVUrJUrA6R0YV234 fYYAuru0M8BhtX X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <46592B92.9060403@xs4all.nl> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 27 May 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Johannes Schindelin escreveu: > > > I recently compiled tcl and tk from scratch on MinGW. (No cross-compile.) > > Worked out of the box: > > > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/tcl/tcl8.4.14-src.tar.gz > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/tcl/tk8.4.14-src.tar.gz > > > > GCC barfs on: > > ((Tcl_Obj **) objv) += (async + 3); Ah yes, I was using MinGW's own GCC, which is GCC 3.something. It is a new "feature" of GCC 4.x to disallow constructs like these. (Probably because GCC people think that other people are not intelligent enough to understand such constructs, and therefore prohibit their use.) Ciao, Dscho