From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: GIT on MinGW problem Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 03:39:08 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1dbc01c79432$b4400a80$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <464534EE.30904@xs4all.nl> <4656A304.AF39A0B6@eudaptics.com> <465C064F.B9CE9379@eudaptics.com> <465C1252.9020801@trolltech.com> <465C2516.7040607@trolltech.com> <465C3502.BE134BC9@eudaptics.com> <465C4B0E.C34795B@eudaptics.com> <465CDE61.40103@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Marius Storm-Olsen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Han-Wen Nienhuys X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 30 04:41:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HtE7Y-00054m-Re for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 04:41:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752001AbXE3Ck4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:40:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752125AbXE3Ck4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:40:56 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:38668 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752001AbXE3Cky (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:40:54 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 May 2007 02:40:52 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 30 May 2007 04:40:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+rk9h0o7CrC4tclR12+F79JHsqcxe97eyc3+6wi/ PhyubLhI58H8Ib X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <465CDE61.40103@xs4all.nl> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 29 May 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Johannes Sixt escreveu: > >> I'd suggest create a small C wrapper to launch gitk. It would be much > >> easier that way IMHO. > > > > Doh! You're right! It's even there already, right before our eyes: > > > > pointy..clicky..pointy..clicky (aka: cp gitk git-k) > > > > $ git k > > > > :) > > how about > > git tk > > that's more in line what actually happens. We can ship a gitk.bat > that runs git-tk. > > BTW, I got one report that gitk doesn't work with the tcl/tk that I > ship. Can I have other reports too? ie. > > "It doesn't work for me, I use windows 92" It worked for me, using Windows XP. (But I don't remember if I had to do some adjustments for it, or only for git-gui.) BTW Almost any operation I run in git-gui fails, because cat is not found. Ciao, Dscho