From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce light weight commit annotations Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:53:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <200706101514.14954.johan@herland.net> <200706102120.55758.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 10 21:56:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HxTWT-0007Kl-Bu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:56:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758331AbXFJT4T (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:56:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758698AbXFJT4T (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:56:19 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47367 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758331AbXFJT4S (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:56:18 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2007 19:56:16 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 21:56:16 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+obwYwv26oqxYiV57usUg3wmM/rwe9fSMJ+9gzAh bszUvDo73Ai9Cb X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200706102120.55758.johan@herland.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > On Sunday 10 June 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > > > Small typo here. "core.showannotaions" should be "core.showannotations", > > > I guess. > > > > Yep. I tested it with "core.shownotes", but decided before sending the > > patch that the name would be inconsistent with the rest of the code. > > > > However, as I suggested later, I could imagine that an even better way > > could be to have "core.annotationsRef", overrideable by > > GIT_ANNOTATIONS_REF, which could possibly even be a list of refs. > > > > BTW I am not married to calling it "annotations". If you like "notes" > > better, I'm fine with it. > > No problem. Actually I really wanted to call my first > proof-of-concept "annotations", and not "notes", but I > figured it would be confused with the "annotate-as-in-blame" > concept. Besides there is already a git-annotate command... Not to forget that note is shorter to type. Ciao, Dscho