From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: That improved git-gui blame viewer.. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:45:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070611064203.GG6073@spearce.org> <7vveduqxxr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> <7vbqflll55.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> <20070612135303.GT6073@spearce.org> <7v645thto7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List To: Marco Costalba X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 13 14:49:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HySHi-000729-Aa for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:49:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757442AbXFMMtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:49:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757546AbXFMMtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:49:12 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59594 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757027AbXFMMtL (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:49:11 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 12:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 14:49:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18G7oF23W4Gzg5UeF5WjkAzWZ6/CErtMKG91+kOMn /VJ/LVSgaggkjZ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > I've made some tests on a git tree copied under Windows: > > running: git rev-list --header --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt > > [...] > > then running: git log --pretty=raw -z --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt Isn't that a bit unfair? You should have passed "--pretty=raw" to rev-list, too. Since you already have that tree, could you try rev-list _with_ "--pretty=raw", just for comparison? Thanks, Dscho