From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] make dist: include configure script in tarball Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:34:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070618213036.GA7222@moooo.ath.cx> <7v1wg8y8ja.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 19 11:34:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0a6I-00014s-8D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:34:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751273AbXFSJeM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:34:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751369AbXFSJeM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:34:12 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40323 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751069AbXFSJeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:34:11 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2007 09:34:10 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 11:34:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18lqcFomasl9YJEDjK4PVdVDE4UBw09vifnNiC+Ot QgNbv/PviZY3qw X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v1wg8y8ja.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > >> Matthias Lederhofer wrote: > >> > >> > +dist: git.spec git-archive configure > >> > >> Ack. This way you don't need autoconf to ./configure install. > > > > ... but you force our good maintainer to have it installed... > > Which is fine by me. Good. That was the kind of Ack I was waiting for. > I was wondering why this wish did not surface much earlier myself. When I was trying to be lazy, and ran configure myself on some machine (sorry, don't remember which one, might well be a MinGW setup), it did not work. So I did not push for it. > Not that I'd use "./configure" myself nor help debugging the > autoconf-generated shell scripts ;-). I fully understand. Ciao, Dscho