From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Basename matching during rename/copy detection Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:52:38 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070621030622.GD8477@spearce.org> <200706210900.49702.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vtzt1ybld.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> <200706211050.03519.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 21 13:52:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I1LDQ-0000cl-S2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:52:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753918AbXFULwn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:52:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754186AbXFULwn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:52:43 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46342 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753779AbXFULwm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:52:42 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 11:52:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2007 13:52:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/AwxlFvELA72+BqI1Xyqiest8HDxF3O/4vc6RLw7 Kn1AHUIvgPaBsW X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200706211050.03519.andyparkins@gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Thursday 2007 June 21, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > It's not even an argument, nor an attempt to justify it. It was just > > an explanation of historical fact "It did not bother". Please re-read > > the final part of the message, which you omitted from your quote. > > I appreciated (as always) your practicality in that what you proposed > would let people keep their copies. What I was objecting to was the > idea that any repository with duplicate files was "stupid". FWIW I find it stupid, too. Ciao, Dscho