From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 100% (was: [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:49:02 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221347480.4059@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ps3oi7ma.fsf_-_@lola.quinscape.zz>
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, David Kastrup wrote:
> As a note aside: would it be possible to always round downwards when
> computing similarities or converting between them?
I'd rather not. This would be counterintuitive. People expect rounded
values.
> I very much would like to see the 100% figure reserved for identity.
> This is particularly relevant when interpreting the output of git-diff
> --name-status with regard to R100, C100 and similar flags.
You should never depend on the output of --name-status if you're
interested in identifying identical files, but on the object names.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 3:06 Basename matching during rename/copy detection Shawn O. Pearce
2007-06-21 3:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21 8:00 ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21 8:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21 9:50 ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21 11:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 12:44 ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21 12:53 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-06-21 13:10 ` Jeff King
2007-06-21 13:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 13:25 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-06-21 13:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 15:37 ` Steven Grimm
2007-06-21 15:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 16:57 ` Steven Grimm
2007-06-21 13:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 11:52 ` [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 13:19 ` Jeff King
2007-06-21 14:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-22 15:19 ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-22 15:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 17:51 ` Aidan Van Dyk
2007-06-22 1:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 5:41 ` Jeff King
2007-06-22 10:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 7:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-06-22 10:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 10:52 ` 100% (was: [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames) David Kastrup
2007-06-22 12:49 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
[not found] ` <86abusi1fw.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
2007-06-23 1:31 ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 10:18 ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 10:56 ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 11:41 ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 12:00 ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 12:11 ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 12:21 ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-24 22:23 ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 19:33 ` 100% Junio C Hamano
2007-06-23 20:41 ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 5:44 ` [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221347480.4059@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).